As part of the system of checks and balances, parties can challenge the initial determination of eligibility and have the opportunity to respond. It was at this stage that some Parties raised concerns about the accuracy of maps submitted by providers. It turns out that their suspicions continue.
After investigation, staff determined that the MF-II coverage map submitted by T-Mobile, US Cellular and Verizon "may overstate the actual coverage of each provider and in many cases does not reflect actual performance." In fact, only 62.3 % Of employees drive test reached the minimum download speed predicted by the coverage map. In fixed tests, less than half of the test positions (20 of the 42 positions) reached the minimum speed.
The Rural Broadband Auction Working Group noted that exaggerating 4G broadband coverage would mislead the public and could lead to misallocation of funds, adding that "it must be dealt with with meaningful consequences".
A full 66-page report of the FCC's investigation can be found here. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai mentioned the survey only briefly in a press release on 5G funding, praising employees "they worked hard after the investigation to get this report."
The FCC wrote in a report detailing the findings: "Exaggerating mobile broadband coverage will mislead the public and may misallocate our limited universal service funds, so it must bear meaningful consequences." In addition to punishing operators, the FCC The staff also suggested that the European Commission formed a team of staff to review the accuracy of mobile broadband maps sent by operators, and asked operators to "submit actual evidence of network performance."
T-Mobile insisted on its map, but told The Verge, "It agrees with the FCC that it has the opportunity to improve its procedures for collecting broadband coverage data for the Mobility Fund map." A spokesperson for US Cellular said: "The Commission is submitting broadband coverage The parameters used in the range map will lead to exaggerated coverage, so the conclusions in the staff report are not surprising to us. "
The FCC will not punish operators in any way. According to Axios, the FCC's failure to detect "clear enough violations of the rules" will require enforcement action. Instead, the FCC will issue recommendations to the entire industry to remind them that they may be penalized for exaggerating their coverage maps.
The European Commission also decided on Wednesday to abandon its $ 4.5 billion Mobility Fund II 4G LTE subsidy program and replace it with a $ 9 billion 5G deployment fund. The FCC said in a press release that the overhaul was due to the discovery of exaggerated coverage maps. The press release said: "Commission staff found that the 4G LTE coverage data submitted by the supplier was not sufficient to advance the Mobility Fund Phase II."
Without an accurate overlay, this money could be wasted. At a House Energy and Commerce hearing with members of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Thursday, lawmakers questioned the agency's decision to radically reform Liquidity Fund II, based on the results of the agency's previous investigation. "That sounds good. I support 5G construction in rural areas, but I don't have any details about the plan," said Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR).
Democrats Jessica Rosenworcel and Geoffrey Starks are frustrated by the accuracy of the Republican majority's decision not to publish the map earlier. "I'm disappointed that we won't hold people accountable for these statements," Starks said.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement on the new 5G fund issued on Wednesday: "We want to ensure that rural residents in the U.S. enjoy these benefits as well as those in big cities." "To that end, universal service funds must be forward-looking and support tomorrow. network of."(Responsible editor: admin)